Public Sector Economics



Effects of grants from EU funds on business performance of non-financial corporations in Croatia*

Domagoj Šelebaj**
Matej Bule**
Article   |   Year:  2021   |   Pages:  177 - 207   |   Volume:  45   |   Issue:  2
Received:  June 1, 2020   |   Accepted:  February 10, 2021   |   Published online:  June 6, 2021
Download citation       

  1. Ackerberg, D., Caves, K. and Garth, F., 2006. Structural identification of production functions. MPRA Paper, 38349.

  2. Bachtrogler, J. and Hammer, C., 2018. Who are the beneficiaries of the structural funds and the cohesion fund and how does the cohesion policy impact firm-level performance? OECD Economics Department Working Papers, No. 1499 [CrossRef]

  3. Bartoluci, M. [et al.], 2018. Sredstva EU fondova u funkciji razvoja ruralnog turizma u Hrvatskoj. Acta Economica Et Turistica, 4(1), pp. 63-78 [CrossRef]

  4. Becker, B., Vanino, E. and Roper, S., 2019. Knowledge to money: assessing the business performance effects of publicly-funded R&D grants. Research policy, 48(7), pp. 1714-1737 [CrossRef]

  5. Benkovskis, K., Tkacevs, O. and Yashiro, N., 2018. Importance of EU Regional Support Programmes for Firm Performance. Latvijas Banka Working Papers, No. 2018/01.

  6. Bouayad-Agha, S., Turpinn, N. and Vedrine, L., 2011. Fostering the development of European regions: A spatial dynamic panel data analysis of the impact of cohesion policy. Regional Studies, 47(9), pp. 1573-1593 [CrossRef]

  7. Breidenbach, P., Mitze, T. and Schmidt, C. M., 2016. EU Structural Funds and Regional Income Convergence - A sobering experience. CEPR Discussion Paper, No. 11210 [CrossRef]

  8. Cappelen, A. [et al.], 2003. The impact of EU regional support on growth and convergence in the European Union. Journal of Common Market Studies, 41(4), pp. 621-644 [CrossRef]

  9. Cerulli, G. and Poti, B., 2014. Public support intensity and company R&D performance: Evidence from a dose-response model. 54th Congress of the European Regional Science Association: "Regional development & globalisation: Best practices", 26-29 August 2014.

  10. Crescenzi, R. and Giua, M., 2017. Different approaches to the analysis of EU cohesion policy. In: J. Bachtler [et al.], eds. EU cohesion policy. Reassessing performance and direction. London: Routledge [CrossRef]

  11. Dai, M., Li, X. and Lu, Y., 2017. How Urbanization Economies Impact TPF of R&D Performers: Evidence from China. Sustainability, 9(10), pp. 1-17 [CrossRef]

  12. Dai, X. and Cheng, L., 2015. The effect of public subsidies on corporate R&D investment: An application of the generalized propensity score. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 90(Part B), pp. 410-419 [CrossRef]

  13. Dall’Erba, S. and Le Gallo, J., 2007. Cohesion policy, the convergence process and employment in the European Union. Czech Journal of Economics and Finance, 57, pp. 324-340.

  14. Dall’Erba, S. and Le Gallo, J., 2008. Regional convergence and the impact of European structural funds over 1989–1999: A spatial econometric analysis. Papers in Regional Science, 87(2), pp. 219-244 [CrossRef]

  15. Darvas, Z., Mazza, J. and Midoes, C., 2019. How to improve European Union cohesion policy for the next decade. Bruegel Policy Contribution, (8).

  16. De Zwaan, M. and Merlevede, B., 2013. Regional policy and firm productivity. European Trade Study Group (ETSG) Working Paper, No. 377.

  17. ECB, 2014. Micro-based evidence of EU competitiveness: The Compnet database. ECB Working paper series, No. 1634.

  18. Ederveen, S. [et al.], 2002. Funds and games: The economics of European cohesion policy. ENEPRI Occasional Paper, No. 3.

  19. Ederveen, S., De Groot, H. L. F. and Nahuis, R., 2006. Fertile soil for structural funds? A panel data analysis of the conditional effectiveness of European cohesion policy. Kyklos, 59(1), pp. 17-42 [CrossRef]

  20. Esposti, R. and Bussoletti, S., 2008. Impact of Objective 1 funds on regional growth convergence in the European Union: A panel data approach. Regional Studies, 42(2), pp. 159-173 [CrossRef]

  21. Fagerberg, J. and Verspagen, B., 1996. Heading for divergence? Regional growth in Europe reconsidered. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 34(3), pp. 431-448 [CrossRef]

  22. Fattorini, L., Ghodsi, M. and Rungi, A., 2018. Cohesion Policy Meets Heterogeneous Firms. WIIW Working Paper, No. 142 [CrossRef]

  23. Ferrara, A. R. [et al.], 2016. Assessing the impacts of cohesion policy on EU regions: A non-parametric analysis on interventions promoting research and innovation and transport accessibility. Papers in Regional Science, 96(4), pp. 817-841 [CrossRef]

  24. Fryges, H. and Wagner, J., 2008. Exports and Productivity Growth: First Evidence from a Continuous Treatment Approach. Review of World Economics, 144, pp. 695-722 [CrossRef]

  25. Galuscak, K. and Lizal, L., 2011. The Impact of Capital Measurement Error Correction on Firm-Level Production Function Estimation. Czech National Bank Working Papers, No. 2011/09.

  26. Gelo, T. and Družić, M., 2015. Ukupna faktorska produktivnost sektora hrvatskoga gospodarstva. Ekonomska misao i praksa, 2(2015), pp. 327-344.

  27. Hagen, T and Mohl, P., 2009. Econometric evaluation of EU Cohesion policy – A survey. ZEW Discussion Paper, No. 09-052.

  28. Hartsenko, J. and Sauga, A., 2013. The role of financial support in SME and economic development in Estonia. Business and Economic Horizons, 9(2), pp. 10-22 [CrossRef]

  29. Hirano, K. and Imbens, G. W., 2004. The propensity score with continuous treatments. In: Gelman, A. and MengX., eds. Applied Bayesian modeling and causal inference from incomplete-data perspectives, pp. 73-84 [CrossRef]

  30. Kersan Škabić, I. and Tijanić, L., 2017. Regional abrorption capacity of EU funds. Economic research - Ekonomska istraživanja, 30(1), pp. 1192-1208 [CrossRef]

  31. Kotarski, V., 2016. European funding – Impact on Research Capacity in Croatia. Review of Innovation and Competitiveness: A Journal of Economic and Social Research, 2(3), pp. 47-64 [CrossRef]

  32. Levinsohn, J. and Petrin, A., 2003. Estimating Production Functions Using Inputs to Control for Unobservables. Review of Economic Studies, 70(2), pp. 317-341 [CrossRef]

  33. Maleković, S., Puljiz, J. and Keser, I., 2017. The Impact of Cohesion Policy on Croatia`s Regional Policy and Development. Zagreb: Institute for Development and International Relations.

  34. Martinis, A. and Ljubaj, I., 2017. Prekomjerni dug poduzeća u Hrvatskoj: mikroprocjena i makroimplikacije. HNB Istraživanja, I-52.

  35. Marzinotto, B., 2012. The growth effects of EU Cohesion policy: A meta-analysis. Bruegel Working Paper, No. 2012/14.

  36. Medić, M., Hadrović Zekić, B. and Sabljo, V., 2017. Impact of EU Funds on Regional Development. In: U. Bacher [et al.], eds. Interdisciplinary Management Research XIII, pp. 1060-1077.

  37. Moral Arce, I. and Paniagua San Martin, M., 2016. An impact evaluation of the EU funds on research and development in Spanish companies in 2007-2011. Papeles de Trabajo del Instituto de Estudios Fiscales, No. 7.

  38. Olley, G. S. and Pakes, A., 1996. The dynamics of productivity in the telecommunications equipment industry. Econometrica, 64(6), pp. 1263-1297 [CrossRef]

  39. Ott, K., Bronić, M. and Stanić, B., 2018. EU grants to Croatian counties, cities and municipalities 2015-2016. Newsletter : an occasional publication of the Institute of Public Finance, No. 114 [CrossRef]

  40. Pienkowski, J. and Berkowitz, P., 2015. Econometric assessments of Cohesion Policy growth effects: How to make them more relevant for policy makers? European Commission Working Paper, No. 02/2015.

  41. Poljičak, A., 2017. The synergy of public procurement and management for projects financed from the European structural and investment funds. Journal of Accounting & Management, 7(1), pp. 57-68.

  42. Rodriguez-Pose, A. and Fratesi, U., 2004. Between development and social policies: The impact of European structural funds in Objective 1 regions. Regional Studies, 38(1), pp. 97-113 [CrossRef]

  43. Rosenbaum, P. R. and Rubin, D., 1983. The Central Role of the Propensity Score in Observational Studies for Causal Effects. Biometrika, 70(1), pp. 41-55 [CrossRef]

  44. Sikirić, S., Sikirić, A. and Vašiček, D., 2015. Lokalni proračun i programsko planiranje u funkciji financiranja projekata iz EU fondova. Business Consultant / Poslovni Konsultant, 7(51), pp. 31-42.

  45. Šostar, M. and Marukić, A., 2017. Challenges of public procurement in Eu funded projects. Journal of Contemporary Management Issues, 22(2), pp. 99-113 [CrossRef]

  46. Srhoj, S., Škrinjarić, B. and Radas, S., 2018. Bidding against the odds? The impact evaluation of grants for young micro and small firms during the recession. Radni materijali EIZ-a, 2(2018), pp. 5-37.

  47. Valdec, M. and Zrnc, J., 2015. The direction of causality between exports and firm performance: microeconomic evidence from Croatia using the matching approach. Financial Theory and Practice, 39(1), pp. 1-30 [CrossRef]

  48. Valdec, M. and Zrnc, J., 2019. Karakteristike hrvatskih izvoznika iz prerađivačkog sektora i oporavak izvoza tijekom velike recesije – rezultati istraživanja modula za trgovinu Istraživačke mreže za konkurentnost (CompNet). HNB Pregledi, P-42.

  49. Viskovic, J. and Udovičić, M., 2017. Awareness of SMEs on the EU Funds Financing Possibilities: The Case of Split-Dalmatia County. KnE Social Sciences, 1(2), pp. 319-332 [CrossRef]

  50. Wooldridge, J. M., 2009. On estimating firm-level production functions using proxy variables to control for unobservables. Economics Letters, 104(3), pp. 112-114 [CrossRef]

  June, 2021
In order to give you a better user experience, cookies have been stored on your computer.
Accept cookie     More information