2518
Views
154
Downloads |
Pension expenditure determinants: the case of Portugal
Maria Teresa Medeiros Garcia* 
André Fernando Rodrigues Rocha da Silva*
André Fernando Rodrigues Rocha da Silva
Affiliation: Lisbon School of Economics and Management, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal
 0000-0001-8123-6557
Article | Year: 2023 | Pages: 177 - 203 | Volume: 47 | Issue: 2 Received: April 21, 2022 | Accepted: January 23, 2023 | Published online: June 12, 2023
|
FULL ARTICLE
FIGURES & DATA
REFERENCES
CROSSMARK POLICY
METRICS
LICENCING
PDF
|
Cointegrating
Eq
|
CointEq1
|
Sample
(adjusted): 1978 to 2014
Included observations: 37 after adjustments
Standard errors in ( ) & t-statistics in [ ]
Determinant residual covariance (dof adj.) 9.01E-11
Determinant residual covariance 9.35E-12
Log likelihood 259.8113
Akaike information criterion -10.36818
Schwarz criterion -7.407571
|
|
|
Pensions to
gross domestic product ratio (-1)
|
1.000000
|
|
|
Log unemployment
(-1)
|
-0.934243
|
|
|
(0.08485)
|
|
|
[-11.0107]
|
|
|
Log apparent
labuor productivity (-1)
|
-3.450917
|
|
|
(0.61569)
|
|
|
[-5.60500]
|
|
|
Old age dependency ratio (-1)
|
-0.114074
|
|
|
(0.07355)
|
|
|
[-1.55089]
|
|
|
@TREND(75)
|
0.024757
|
|
|
|
|
C
|
18.19483
|
|
|
|
|
Error Correction:
|
D(Pensions to gross domestic product ratio)
|
D(Log unemployment)
|
D(Log apparent labor productivity)
|
D(Old age dependency ratio)
|
|
CointEq1
|
-0.823727
|
0.355044
|
-0.085035
|
-0.229154
|
|
(0.25145)
|
(0.27994)
|
(0.02454)
|
(0.19648)
|
|
[-3.27589]
|
[1.26830]
|
[-3.46495]
|
[-1.16627]
|
|
D(Pensions to
gross domestic product ratio (-1))
|
0.048722
|
-0.134046
|
0.037997
|
0.216371
|
|
(0.23937)
|
(0.26649)
|
(0.02336)
|
(0.18705)
|
|
[0.20354]
|
[-0.50301]
|
[1.62640]
|
[1.15678]
|
|
D(Pensions to
gross domestic product ratio (-2))
|
-0.023504
|
-0.327028
|
0.023747
|
0.140985
|
|
(0.19428)
|
(0.21629)
|
(0.01896)
|
(0.15181)
|
|
[-0.12098]
|
[-1.51196]
|
[1.25233]
|
[0.92867]
|
|
D(Log
unemployment (-1))
|
0.402031
|
0.652833
|
-0.002592
|
0.147807
|
|
(0.24351)
|
(0.27110)
|
(0.02377)
|
(0.19028)
|
|
[1.65098]
|
[2.40812]
|
[-0.10904]
|
[0.77679]
|
|
D(Log
unemployment (-2))
|
-0.006098
|
0.136222
|
-0.054351
|
-0.148583
|
|
(0.24210)
|
(0.26952)
|
(0.02363)
|
(0.18918)
|
|
[-0.02519]
|
[0.50542]
|
[-2.30024]
|
[-0.78542]
|
|
D(Log
apparent labour productivity (-1))
|
-0.221389
|
3.246082
|
-0.463845
|
-1.234411
|
|
(2.35803)
|
(2.62517)
|
(0.23014)
|
(1.84257)
|
|
[-0.09389]
|
[1.23652]
|
[-2.01547]
|
[-0.66994]
|
|
D(Log
apparent labour productivity (-2))
|
0.580083
|
0.776474
|
-0.055980
|
-0.496768
|
|
(1.60695)
|
(1.78900)
|
(0.15684)
|
(1.25567)
|
|
[0.36098]
|
[0.43403]
|
[-0.35693]
|
[-0.39562]
|
|
D(Old age dependency ratio (-1))
|
0.170345
|
-0.345219
|
0.035069
|
0.468223
|
|
(0.26139)
|
(0.29100)
|
(0.02551)
|
(0.20425)
|
|
[0.65169]
|
[-1.18632]
|
[.37463]
|
[2.29241]
|
|
D(Old age
dependency ratio (-2))
|
0.371367
|
-0.035296
|
0.046423
|
0.150022
|
|
(0.20938)
|
(0.23310)
|
(0.02044)
|
(0.16361)
|
|
[1.77363]
|
[-0.15142]
|
[2.27169]
|
[0.91694]
|
|
C
|
-0.066069
|
-0.010129
|
0.001324
|
-0.066055
|
|
(0.13892)
|
(0.15466)
|
(0.01356)
|
(0.10855)
|
|
[-0.47559]
|
[-0.06550]
|
[0.09766]
|
[-0.60851]
|
|
@TREND(75)
|
0.007064
|
0.012654
|
-0.001357
|
0.003988
|
|
(0.01497)
|
(0.01667)
|
(0.00146)
|
(0.01170)
|
|
[0.47172]
|
[0.75905]
|
[-0.92828]
|
[0.34082]
|
|
REV1974
|
-0.268243
|
-0.002228
|
0.053747
|
0.162941
|
|
(0.13658)
|
(0.15206)
|
(0.01333)
|
(0.10673)
|
|
[-1.96393]
|
[-0.01465]
|
[4.03186]
|
[1.52670]
|
|
R1984
|
0.077589
|
-0.199898
|
0.054140
|
0.244170
|
|
(0.11939)
|
(0.13292)
|
(0.01165)
|
(0.09329)
|
|
[0.64988]
|
[-1.50395]
|
[4.64628]
|
[2.61728]
|
|
R1993
|
-0.383299
|
0.032310
|
-0.040317
|
-0.117924
|
|
(0.17433)
|
(0.19408)
|
(0.01701)
|
(0.13622)
|
|
[-2.19869]
|
[0.16648]
|
[-2.36955]
|
[-0.86567]
|
|
R2002
|
-0.099864
|
-0.004149
|
0.002105
|
-0.144916
|
|
(0.16839)
|
(0.18746)
|
(0.01643)
|
(0.13158)
|
|
[-0.59306]
|
[-0.02213]
|
[0.12808]
|
[-1.10136]
|
|
R2007
|
0.169199
|
-0.040558
|
0.000708
|
0.179928
|
|
(0.10280)
|
(0.11445)
|
(0.01003)
|
(0.08033)
|
|
[1.64589]
|
[-0.35438]
|
[0.07054]
|
[2.23988]
|
|
R-squared
|
0.685045
|
0.413290
|
0.802777
|
0.842369
|
|
Adj.
R-squared
|
0.460078
|
-0.005789
|
0.661903
|
0.729776
|
|
Sum sq.
resids
|
0.304910
|
0.377908
|
0.002904
|
0.186175
|
|
S.E. equation
|
0.120497
|
0.134148
|
0.011760
|
0.094157
|
|
F-statistic
|
3.045086
|
0.986188
|
5.698563
|
7.481515
|
|
Log
likelihood
|
36.27442
|
32.30368
|
122.3691
|
45.40105
|
|
Akaike AIC
|
-1.095914
|
-0.881280
|
-5.749681
|
-1.589246
|
|
Schwarz SC
|
-0.399301
|
-0.184667
|
-5.053068
|
-0.892633
|
|
Mean
dependent
|
0.124324
|
0.023130
|
0.020237
|
0.367568
|
|
S.D.
dependent
|
0.163987
|
0.133761
|
0.020226
|
0.181129
|
Source: Authors’ computation.
Source: Authors’ computation.
|
Coefficient
|
Std. error
|
t-Statistic
|
Prob.
|
|
C(1)
|
-0.8237
|
0.2515
|
-3.2759
|
0.0036
|
|
C(2)
|
0.0487
|
0.2394
|
0.2035
|
0.8407
|
|
C(3)
|
-0.0235
|
0.1943
|
-0.1210
|
0.9049
|
|
C(4)
|
0.4020
|
0.2435
|
1.6510
|
0.1136
|
|
C(5)
|
-0.0061
|
0.2421
|
-0.0252
|
0.9801
|
|
C(6)
|
-0.2214
|
2.3580
|
-0.0939
|
0.9261
|
|
C(7)
|
0.5801
|
1.6070
|
0.3610
|
0.7217
|
|
C(8)
|
0.1703
|
0.2614
|
0.6517
|
0.5217
|
|
C(9)
|
0.3714
|
0.2094
|
1.7736
|
0.0906
|
|
C(10)
|
-0.0661
|
0.1389
|
-0.4756
|
0.6393
|
|
C(11)
|
0.0071
|
0.0150
|
0.4717
|
0.6420
|
|
C(12)
|
-0.2682
|
0.1366
|
-1.9639
|
0.0629
|
|
C(13)
|
0.0776
|
0.1194
|
0.6497
|
0.5228
|
|
C(14)
|
-0.3833
|
0.1743
|
-2.1987
|
0.0392
|
|
C(15)
|
-0.0999
|
0.1684
|
-0.5931
|
0.5595
|
|
C(16)
|
0.1692
|
0.1028
|
1.6459
|
0.1147
|
|
R-squared
|
0.6850
|
Mean dependent var
|
|
0.1243
|
|
Adjusted
R-squared
|
0.4601
|
S.D. dependent var
|
|
0.1640
|
|
S.E.
of regression
|
0.1205
|
Akaike info criterion
|
|
-1.0959
|
|
Sum
squared resid
|
0.3049
|
Schwarz criterion
|
|
-0.3993
|
|
Log
likelihood
|
36.274
|
Hannan-Quinn criter.
|
|
-0.8503
|
|
F-statistic
|
3.0451
|
Durbin-Watson stat
|
|
2.3277
|
|
Prob(F-statistic)
|
0.0097
|
|
|
|
|
Variables
|
Mean
|
Median
|
Max
|
Min
|
Std. dev.
|
Skewness
|
Kurtosis
|
Jarque-Bera
|
|
Dependent variable
|
|
Pensions in %
of GDP
|
5.05
|
5.15
|
7.70
|
2.20
|
1.28
|
0.16
|
2.82
|
0.28
(0.89)
|
|
Independent variables
|
|
Log
unemployment
|
12.75
|
12.72
|
13.66
|
12.09
|
0.38
|
0.65
|
3.14
|
2.82
(0.24)
|
|
Log apparent
labour productivity
|
2.69
|
2.77
|
3.01
|
2.18
|
0.28
|
-0.53
|
2.03
|
3.43
(0.18)
|
|
Old age
dependency ratio
|
22.35
|
22.00
|
30.70
|
16.30
|
4.09
|
0.33
|
1.94
|
2.61
(0.27)
|
|
No. of
observations
|
40
|
Source: authors’ computation.
|
|
Dickey-Fuller
test
|
Phillips-Perron
test
|
|
|
Deterministic
component
|
P-Value
|
T-Stat
|
Deterministic
component
|
P-Value
|
Adj.
T-Stat
|
|
Dependent
variable
|
|
Pensions in %
of GDP
|
constant
and trend
|
0.44
|
-2.27
|
constant
and trend
|
0.29
|
-2.59
|
|
First
difference
|
constant
|
0
|
-6.23
|
constant
|
0
|
-6.24
|
|
Independent
variables
|
|
Old age
dependency ratio
|
constant
and trend
|
0.98
|
-0.45
|
constant
and trend
|
0.99
|
0.41
|
|
First
difference
|
constant
and trend
|
0.005
|
-4.53
|
constant
and trend
|
0.004
|
-4.58
|
|
Log unemployment
|
constant
and trend
|
0.39
|
-2.36
|
constant
and trend
|
0.69
|
-1.78
|
|
First
difference
|
none
|
0.000
|
-3.97
|
none
|
0.00
|
-3.97
|
|
Log apparent
labour productivity
|
constant
and trend
|
0.86
|
-1.33
|
constant
and trend
|
0.83
|
-1.46
|
|
First
difference
|
constant
and trend
|
0.017
|
-4.01
|
constant
and trend
|
0.017
|
-4.01
|
|
Lag
|
LogL
|
LR
|
FPE
|
AIC
|
SC
|
HQ
|
|
0
|
-86.6845
|
NA
|
0.0044
|
5.9269
|
6.8066
|
6.2340
|
|
1
|
212.3587
|
448.5649
|
6.82e-10
|
-9.7977
|
-8.2142*
|
-9.2450
|
|
2
|
240.9137
|
36.4869*
|
3.73e-10*
|
-10.495
|
-8.2079
|
-9.6969*
|
|
3
|
257.5250
|
17.5341
|
4.35e-10
|
-10.529
|
-7.5381
|
-9.4852
|
|
4
|
278.0591
|
17.1118
|
4.79e-10
|
-10.781*
|
-7.0861
|
-9.4915
|
Endogenous variables: Pensions in percentage of gross domestic product Log unemployment Log apparent labour productivity Old age dependency ratio Exogenous variables: REV1974 R1984 R1993 R2002 R2007 Sample: 1975 2014; Included observations: 36 AIC: Akaike information criterion; SC: Schwarz information criterion; LR: sequential modified; LR test statistic (each test at 5% level); FPE: Final prediction error; HQ: Hannan-Quinn information criterion.
|
Data Trend:
|
None
|
None
|
Linear
|
Linear
|
Quadratic
|
|
Test Type
|
No Intercept
|
Intercept
|
Intercept
|
Intercept
|
Intercept
|
|
|
No Trend
|
No Trend
|
No Trend
|
Trend
|
Trend
|
|
Trace
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
|
Max-Eig
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
|
*Critical values based on
MacKinnon-Haug-Michelis (1999)
|
|
|
|
|
Information Criteria by Rank and Model
|
|
|
|
|
Data Trend:
|
None
|
None
|
Linear
|
Linear
|
Quadratic
|
|
Rank or
|
No Intercept
|
Intercept
|
Intercept
|
Intercept
|
Intercept
|
|
No. of CEs
|
No Trend
|
No Trend
|
No Trend
|
Trend
|
Trend
|
|
Log Likelihood by Rank (rows) and Model
(columns)
|
|
0
|
192.5650
|
192.5650
|
195.6342
|
195.6342
|
199.7912
|
|
1
|
199.4257
|
208.0199
|
210.6990
|
212.6689
|
216.0536
|
|
2
|
204.8373
|
214.6224
|
217.2509
|
223.7600
|
226.8486
|
|
3
|
207.8471
|
218.6760
|
220.1204
|
228.7651
|
229.9657
|
|
4
|
210.2947
|
221.3637
|
221.3637
|
231.0177
|
231.0177
|
|
Akaike Information Criteria by Rank
(rows) and Model (columns)
|
|
0
|
-8.679192
|
-8.679192
|
-8.628876
|
-8.628876
|
-8.637363
|
|
1
|
-8.617606
|
-9.028103
|
-9.010758
|
-9.063185
|
-9.083981
|
|
2
|
-8.477689
|
-8.898507
|
-8.932482
|
-9.176216
|
-9.235057*
|
|
3
|
-8.207949
|
-8.631136
|
-8.655158
|
-8.960277
|
-8.971121
|
|
4
|
-7.907822
|
-8.289927
|
-8.289927
|
-8.595552
|
-8.595552
|
|
Schwarz Criteria by Rank (rows) and Model
(columns)
|
|
0
|
-7.285965*
|
-7.285965*
|
-7.061496
|
-7.061496
|
-6.895830
|
|
1
|
-6.876073
|
-7.243032
|
-7.095072
|
-7.103961
|
-6.994141
|
|
2
|
-6.387850
|
-6.721591
|
-6.668490
|
-6.825147
|
-6.796911
|
|
3
|
-5.769803
|
-6.062375
|
-6.042859
|
-6.217363
|
-6.184668
|
|
4
|
-5.121369
|
-5.329322
|
-5.329322
|
-5.460793
|
-5.460793
|
Sample: 1975 2014 Included observations: 37 Series: Pensions in percentage of gross domestic product Log unemployment Log apparent labour productivity Old age dependency ratio Lags interval: 1 to 2 Selected (0.05 level*) Number of Co-integrating Relations by Model
|
Variables
|
Mean
|
Median
|
Max
|
Min
|
Std. dev.
|
Skewness
|
Kurtosis
|
Jarque-Bera
|
|
Resid01
|
2.25E-17
|
-0.007
|
0.236
|
-0.191
|
0.092
|
0.399
|
3.113
|
1.006
(0.605)
|
|
Resid02
|
-3.00E-18
|
0.015
|
0.245
|
-0.220
|
0.102
|
0.198
|
2.897
|
0.259
(0.879)
|
|
Resid03
|
5.06E-18
|
-0.001
|
0.018
|
-0.021
|
0.010
|
-0.065
|
3.14
|
0.042
(0.979)
|
|
Resid04
|
2.69
|
2.77
|
3.01
|
2.18
|
0.28
|
2.90
|
2.32
|
0.775
(0.679)
|
|
No. of
observations
|
37
|
Note: In parenthesis the probability.
|
Chi-sq
|
df
|
Prob.
|
|
257.1420
|
250
|
0.3646
|
Sample: 1975 2014 Included observations: 37
|
Variables
|
Resid01
|
Resid02
|
Resid03
|
Resid04
|
|
Pensions in %
of GDP
|
0.0022
|
-0.0009
|
-6.561464E-05
|
0.0004
|
|
Old age
dependency ratio
|
-0.0026
|
-0.0062
|
8.657489E-05
|
0.0079
|
|
Log
unemployment
|
-0.0007
|
-0.0002
|
-6.941109E-05
|
0.0010
|
|
Log apparent
labor productivity
|
0.0020
|
0.0004
|
6.809052E-05
|
-0.0003
|
|
Component
|
Skewness
|
Chi-sq
|
df
|
Prob.
|
|
1
|
0.399830
|
0.985828
|
1
|
0.3208
|
|
2
|
-0.039593
|
0.009667
|
1
|
0.9217
|
|
3
|
0.267474
|
0.441177
|
1
|
0.5066
|
|
4
|
-0.430280
|
1.141701
|
1
|
0.2853
|
|
Joint
|
|
2.578373
|
4
|
0.6307
|
|
Component
|
Kurtosis
|
Chi-sq
|
df
|
Prob.
|
|
1
|
3.113281
|
0.019784
|
1
|
0.8881
|
|
2
|
2.672602
|
0.165250
|
1
|
0.6844
|
|
3
|
2.471544
|
0.430535
|
1
|
0.5117
|
|
4
|
2.776496
|
0.077013
|
1
|
0.7814
|
|
Joint
|
|
0.692582
|
4
|
0.9522
|
|
Component
|
Jarque-Bera
|
df
|
Prob.
|
|
|
1
|
1.005611
|
2
|
0.6048
|
|
|
2
|
0.174917
|
2
|
0.9163
|
|
|
3
|
0.871713
|
2
|
0.6467
|
|
|
4
|
1.218713
|
2
|
0.5437
|
|
|
Joint
|
3.270955
|
8
|
0.9162
|
|
Orthogonalisation: Cholesky (Lutkepohl) Null Hypothesis: residuals are multivariate normal Sample: 1975 to 2014 Included observations: 37
|
Lags
|
LM-Stat
|
Prob
|
|
1
|
26.53845
|
0.0469
|
|
2
|
23.67038
|
0.0970
|
|
3
|
14.33662
|
0.5737
|
|
4
|
12.13793
|
0.7344
|
|
5
|
17.84991
|
0.3328
|
|
6
|
15.06970
|
0.5195
|
|
Probs from chi-square with 16 df.
|
|
Null Hypothesis: no serial correlation at lag order h Sample: 1975 2014 Included observations: 37
|
Unrestricted
Co-integration Rank Test (Trace)
|
|
Hypothesized
No. of CE(s)
|
Eigenvalue
|
Trace
Statistic
|
0.05 Critical
Value
|
Prob.**
|
|
None *
|
0.5848
|
62.453
|
55.2458
|
0.0102
|
|
At most 1
|
0.4421
|
29.923
|
35.0109
|
0.1580
|
|
At most 2
|
0.1551
|
8.338
|
18.3977
|
0.6481
|
|
At most 3
|
0.0553
|
2.1040
|
3.84147
|
0.1469
|
|
Trace test
indicates 1 co-integrating eqn(s) at the 0.05 level
* Denotes rejection of the hypothesis at the 0.05 level
**MacKinnon-Haug-Michelis (1999) p-values
|
|
Unrestricted
Co-integration Rank Test (Maximum Eigenvalue)
|
|
Hypothesized
No. of CE(s)
|
Eigenvalue
|
Max-Eigen
|
0.05
|
|
|
|
Statistic
|
Critical
Value
|
Prob.**
|
|
None *
|
0.5848
|
32.5249
|
30.8151
|
0.0306
|
|
At most 1
|
0.4421
|
21.5898
|
24.2520
|
0.1082
|
|
At most 2
|
0.1551
|
6.2343
|
17.1477
|
0.7936
|
|
At most 3
|
0.0553
|
2.1040
|
3.84145
|
0.1469
|
|
Max-eigenvalue
test indicates 1 co-integrating eqn(s) at the 0.05 level
* Denotes rejection of the hypothesis at the 0.05 level
**MacKinnon-Haug-Michelis (1999) p-values
|
|
Unrestricted
Co-integrating Coefficients (normalised by b'*S11*b=I):
|
|
Pensions in
percentage of GDP
|
Log
unemployment
|
Log
apparent labor productivity
|
Old
age
dependency ratio
|
|
|
6.4595
|
-8.5289
|
-11.7489
|
1.4318
|
|
|
1.6370
|
-6.7668
|
-37.7933
|
-1.0975
|
|
|
6.4758
|
-3.6887
|
-25.9967
|
-0.8533
|
|
|
-1.8548
|
3.5122
|
20.2981
|
-2.5845
|
|
|
Unrestricted Adjustment Coefficients (alpha):
|
|
D(Pensions in
percentage of GDP)
|
-0.0493
|
0.00881
|
-0.0167
|
-0.0274
|
|
D(Log
unemployment)
|
0.0496
|
0.03077
|
-0.0121
|
-0.0156
|
|
D(Log
apparent labor productivity)
|
-0.0074
|
0.00668
|
0.0009
|
0.0012
|
|
D(Old age
dependency ratio)
|
-0.0291
|
0.0144
|
0.0329
|
-0.0019
|
|
1
Co-integrating Equation(s): Log likelihood 216.0536
|
|
Normalized
co-integrating coefficients (standard error in brackets)
|
|
Pensions in
percentage of GDP
|
Log
unemployment
|
Log
apparent labor productivity
|
Old
age dependency ratio
|
|
|
1.000000
|
-1.3204
(0.163)
|
-1.8189
(0.936)
|
0.2217
(0.082)
|
|
|
Adjustment
coefficients (standard error in brackets)
|
|
D(Pensions in
percentage of GDP)
|
-0.3182
(0.16656)
|
|
|
|
|
D(Log
unemployment)
|
0.3206
(0.12175)
|
|
|
|
|
D(Log
apparent labor productivity)
|
-0.0477
(0.01652)
|
|
|
|
|
D(Old age
dependency ratio)
|
-0.1883
(0.11411)
|
|
|
|
Source: Authors’ computation. Sample (adjusted): 1978 2014 Included observations: 37 after adjustments Trend assumption: Quadratic deterministic trend Series: Pensions in percentage of gross domestic product Log unemployment Log apparent labour productivity Old age dependency ratio Lags interval (in first differences): 1 to 2
|
Years ahead
|
Pensions
in percentage
of GDP
|
Log
unemployment
|
Log
apparent
labour productivity
|
Old
age
dependency ratio
|
St.
errors
|
|
1
|
39.76
|
57.39
|
0.00
|
2.86
|
0.12
|
|
2
|
14.09
|
81.98
|
1.80
|
2.13
|
0.21
|
|
3
|
6.51
|
86.96
|
4.92
|
1.61
|
0.30
|
|
4
|
4.12
|
87.13
|
5.94
|
2.81
|
0.39
|
|
5
|
3.15
|
86.15
|
6.97
|
3.73
|
0.45
|
|
6
|
2.68
|
85.39
|
7.33
|
4.59
|
0.49
|
|
7
|
2.41
|
85.04
|
7.55
|
5.00
|
0.52
|
|
8
|
2.19
|
85.06
|
7.56
|
5.18
|
0.54
|
|
9
|
2.02
|
85.24
|
7.58
|
5.15
|
0.57
|
|
10
|
1.84
|
85.49
|
7.57
|
5.10
|
0.60
|
|
11
|
1.67
|
85.65
|
7.61
|
5.07
|
0.63
|
|
12
|
1.52
|
85.73
|
7.66
|
5.09
|
0.66
|
|
13
|
1.40
|
85.72
|
7.72
|
5.15
|
0.69
|
|
14
|
1.31
|
85.71
|
7.77
|
5.22
|
0.71
|
|
15
|
1.23
|
85.70
|
7.80
|
5.27
|
0.73
|
|
16
|
1.16
|
85.72
|
7.82
|
5.30
|
0.76
|
|
17
|
1.09
|
85.75
|
7.83
|
5.32
|
0.78
|
|
18
|
1.04
|
85.79
|
7.85
|
5.33
|
0.80
|
|
19
|
0.98
|
85.81
|
7.87
|
5.34
|
0.82
|
|
20
|
0.93
|
85.83
|
7.88
|
5.35
|
0.84
|
|
Hypothesized no. of CE(s)
|
Eigenvalue
|
Trace
Statistic
|
0.05 Critical
value
|
Prob.**
|
|
None *
|
0.7395
|
84.7403
|
55.2458
|
0.0000
|
|
At most 1
|
0.4658
|
34.9636
|
35.0109
|
0.0506
|
|
At most 2
|
0.2490
|
11.7627
|
18.3977
|
0.3270
|
|
At most 3
|
0.0311
|
1.1681
|
3.8415
|
0.2798
|
|
Trace test indicates 1 co-integrating
eqn(s) at the 0.05 level
|
|
|
|
* Denotes rejection of the hypothesis at
the 0.05 level
|
|
|
|
**MacKinnon-Haug-Michelis (1999) p-values
|
|
|
|
Unrestricted Co-integration Rank Test
(Maximum Eigenvalue)
|
|
|
|
Hypothesised no. of CE(s)
|
Eigenvalue
|
Max-Eigen
Statistic
|
0.05 Critical
value
|
Prob.**
|
|
None *
|
0.7395
|
49.7768
|
30.8151
|
0.0001
|
|
At most 1
|
0.4658
|
23.2009
|
24.2520
|
0.0684
|
|
At most 2
|
0.2490
|
10.5945
|
17.1477
|
0.3447
|
|
At most 3
|
0.0311
|
1.1681
|
3.84147
|
0.2798
|
|
Max-eigenvalue test indicates 1
co-integrating eqn(s) at the 0.05 level
|
|
|
|
* Denotes rejection of the hypothesis at
the 0.05 level
|
|
|
|
**MacKinnon-Haug-Michelis (1999) p-values
|
|
|
|
Unrestricted Co-integrating Coefficients
(normalised by b'*S11*b=I):
|
|
|
|
Pensions in percentage of GDP
|
Log
unemployment
|
Log apparent
labour productivity
|
Old age dependency
ratio
|
|
|
12.69343
|
-11.8587
|
-43.8040
|
-1.4480
|
|
|
-1.652246
|
-4.79285
|
1.2328
|
-0.8655
|
|
|
6.893543
|
-12.1842
|
-77.0428
|
3.6249
|
|
|
-2.640094
|
3.0243
|
51.6066
|
6.0229
|
|
|
Unrestricted Adjustment Co-efficients
(alpha):
|
|
|
|
D(Pensions in percentage of GDP)
|
-0.0649
|
0.0490
|
0.0171
|
0.0036
|
|
D(Log unemployment)
|
0.0280
|
0.0668
|
0.0094
|
0.0001
|
|
D(Log apparent labour productivity L)
|
-0.0067
|
-0.0010
|
-0.0013
|
-0.0013
|
|
D(OAD)
|
-0.0181
|
-0.0224
|
0.0240
|
-0.0069
|
|
1 Co-integrating Equation(s):
|
Log likelihood
|
259.8113
|
|
Normalised co-integrating coefficients
(standard error in brackets)
|
|
|
|
Pensions
in percentage of GDP
|
Log unemployment
|
Log apparent labour productivity
|
Old age dependency ratio
|
|
|
1.000000
|
-0.9342
|
-3.4509
|
-0.1141
|
|
|
(0.0849)
|
(0.6157)
|
(0.0736)
|
|
|
Adjustment coefficients (standard error
in brackets)
|
|
|
|
D(Pensions in percentage of gross
domestic product)
|
-0.8237
|
|
|
|
|
(0.2515)
|
|
|
|
|
D(Log unemployment)
|
0.3550
|
|
|
|
|
(0.2799)
|
|
|
|
|
D(Log apparent labour productivity)
|
-0.0850
|
|
|
|
|
(0.0245)
|
|
|
|
|
D(Old age dependency ratio)
|
-0.2292
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1965)
|
|
|
|
Sample (adjusted): 1978 2014 Included observations: 37 after adjustments Trend assumption: Quadratic deterministic trend Series: Pensions in percentage of gross domestic product Log unemployment Log apparent labour productivity Old age dependency ratio Exogenous series: REV1974 R1984 R1993 R2002 R2007 Warning: Critical values assume no exogenous series Lags interval (in first differences): 1 to 2 Unrestricted Co-integration Rank Test (Trace)
|
Test Statistic
|
Value
|
df
|
Probability
|
|
F-statistic
|
1.3647
|
(2, 21)
|
0.2772
|
|
Chi-square
|
2.7294
|
2
|
0.2555
|
|
Null Hypothesis: C(4)=C(5)=0
|
|
|
|
Null Hypothesis Summary:
|
|
|
|
Normalised Restriction (= 0)
|
|
Value
|
Std. Err.
|
|
C(4)
|
|
0.4020
|
0.2435
|
|
C(5)
|
|
-0.0061
|
0.2421
|
|
All restrictions are linear in
coefficients.
|
|
|
Test Statistic
|
Value
|
df
|
Probability
|
|
F-statistic
|
0.0660
|
(2, 21)
|
0.9363
|
|
Chi-square
|
0.1320
|
2
|
0.9361
|
|
Null Hypothesis: C(6)=C(7)=0
|
|
|
|
Null Hypothesis Summary:
|
|
|
|
Normalised Restriction (= 0)
|
|
Value
|
Std. Err.
|
|
C(6)
|
|
-0.2214
|
2.3580
|
|
C(7)
|
|
0.5801
|
1.6070
|
|
Test Statistic
|
Value
|
df
|
Probability
|
|
F-statistic
|
1.8520
|
(2, 21)
|
0.1817
|
|
Chi-square
|
3.7040
|
2
|
0.1569
|
|
Null Hypothesis: C(8)=C(9)=0
|
|
|
|
Null Hypothesis Summary:
|
|
|
|
Normalised Restriction (= 0)
|
|
Value
|
Std. Err.
|
|
C(8)
|
|
0.1703
|
0.2614
|
|
C(9)
|
|
0.3714
|
0.2094
|
Crossmark is a multi-publisher initiative from Crossref to provide a standard way for readers to locate the current version of a piece of content. By applying the Crossmark logo, the Institute of Public Finance is committing to maintaining the content it publishes and to alerting readers to changes if and when they occur. Clicking on the Crossmark logo will tell you the current status of a document and may also give you additional publication record information about the document.
|
|
June, 2023
II/2023
|
