1583 Views
743 Downloads |
Public value and public services in the post-virus economy
Tony Kinder*
Tony Kinder
Affiliation: Tampere University, Faculty of Management, Tampere, Finland
0000-0003-2769-3655
Jari Stenvall*
Preliminary communication | Year: 2021 | Pages: 329 - 361 | Volume: 45 | Issue: 3 Received: November 4, 2020 | Accepted: March 24, 2021 | Published online: September 6, 2021
|
FULL ARTICLE
FIGURES & DATA
REFERENCES
CROSSMARK POLICY
METRICS
LICENCING
PDF
Traded goods and services income
|
Untraded goods and services value estimates
|
Explanation
|
2,000
|
|
Projected GDP (likely to revise
downwards as a result of virus lockdown.
|
1,800
|
|
Less 10% downward revision,
allowing for virus lockdown
|
|
-680
|
Public sector total spending at
34% of GDP)
|
|
-20
|
Voluntary sector 1% GDP
contribution
|
|
|
|
|
-1,260
|
Estimated value of household
use-values (ONS estimates at 64% of GDP
|
1,800
|
-1,960
|
Totals
|
90%
|
98%
|
Percentage of GDP as EVs and UVs
|
|
|
|
Note: All figures [£] billion and 2020 to 2021.
PM PV themes
|
Sub-themes
|
Authors
|
(1) Values to value (V2V): The Marketing perspective
|
Subjective
user-satisfaction measurement
|
Value
alternative to NPM
|
Moore
(2005); Benington (2009),
|
|
Normative,
metaphoric alternative to price and efficiency (NPM)
|
Vargo
and Lusch (2008) paradigm switch (private sector)
|
|
Subjective
user-satisfaction, metrics and PV Management
|
Stoker
(2006); Behn (2001); Mulgan (2002)
|
Ranking
values
|
Value
situated: no consensus across time and space
|
Rutgers
(2008) Kahneman and Tversky (1979)
|
Sandel
(2009) on justice; Milanovic (2016) needs/wants
|
Subjective
and objective user-satisfaction measurement
|
PV
solves users’ problems using UVs: crossing all governances not confined to
private or private sector; negotiated in each situation
|
Laitinen
(2017)
|
Cordery
and Hay (2019); Tirronen et al (2020)
|
(2) Cocreation: the engagement perspective
|
User-led
innovation frame
|
Social
shaping of technology
|
Von
Hippel (1988)
|
Mackenzie
and Wajcman (1985)
|
Production
frame:
|
PV
a better frame for problem-solving than cocreation; collective value
|
Liebenstein
(1966); Ostrom (1996); Connolly and Wall (2016)
|
New
public governances
|
Public
Service Dominant Logic
|
Osborne
(2017)
|
(3) Public value management (PVM): the management perspective
|
PVM
paradigm
|
Manager
at the centre driving change towards user needs
|
Normann
(2002); Stoker (2006); Grönroos (2013)
|
Value-creating
not only value-distributing state
|
Not
bureaucratic, entrepreneurial;
|
Mazzucato
(2013); Inwin (2019)
|
Urban
regime/change coalition
|
Localist
new governances
|
Bardach
(1998)
|
Localised
interactions: value flow patterns create ‘soft’ structures
|
Governance-as-legitimacy
|
Laclau
(1990); Kinder et al (2020)
|
“e”
with everything: technology-led change
|
Technology-led
change e.g. AI
|
Cordella
and Bonina 2012; Goldin and Katz’s (2008); Kinder (2020a)
|
Source: Authors.
|
Factor and function
|
Activity and relationships
|
1
|
Government provides public services and
manages economy
|
Manages state spending level and deficit; sets
interest rates, exchange rate band and employment target, aligns Treasury and
Central Bank: manages aggregate-demand; spends before taxing and
borrowing. Pays taxes and interest to
itself.
|
2
|
Private sector invests, produces sells to
accumulate profit; some PPPs and supply to public sector
|
Invests, employs and sells to suit
profit-making at times leaving deficit state can fill be creating
aggregate-demand that stimulates investment and economic activity. Pay taxes to Government, purchases Treasury
debt.
|
3
|
International trade sector balance of trade
and payments
|
Overall international trade balance (goods and
services) creating surplus or deficit of foreign currency; inward and outward
capital investment
|
4
|
Natural environment major part of wellbeing
and sustainable living
|
Quality of nature is/should be a constraint on
economic activity and positive externalities; state control of negative
externalities, such as carbon emissions, degrading and abuse
|
5
|
Regime of accumulation: production of goods
and services
|
Production, supply, 5-factors e.g. different Fordist
to post-Fordist and neoliberal: drivers: accumulation + dominant value
relationships (EV or mixed and UV)
|
6
|
Mode of regulation: consumption of goods and
services, provision of labour force and carers
|
Consumption, demand, market regulation, SCM internationally,
ways we buy life-as-lived
|
7
|
Balance economy not budget
|
S(TAB) not TAB(S) BUT activity might be
non-market; inflation danger (Mattick) state spend > productivity
|
8
|
State regulates markets, sets legal and fiscal
regime, gathers taxes, manages aggregate-demand
|
Balance in economy; if growth by private
sector stalls, need aggregate-D boost by public
|
9
|
Trades goods, services and capital, including
migration
|
State vies with MNCs to control international
trade: tariffs, regulations, OFDI and IFDI; currency exposure; fiat currency
|
10
|
Alignment of mode regime with mode
|
Overall economy alignment: supply/demand;
production/consumption: 5-facrors in either side; complexity economics
|
11
|
Alignment of mode with regime
|
Misalignment = crisis (accumulation
opportunities, including internationally); also, who pays price of crisis?
|
12
|
Mode and regime and nature
|
Nature; Burkett; > constraint, wellbeing
and QWL.
|
Source: Authors.
Crossmark is a multi-publisher initiative from Crossref to provide a standard way for readers to locate the current version of a piece of content. By applying the Crossmark logo, the Institute of Public Finance is committing to maintaining the content it publishes and to alerting readers to changes if and when they occur. Clicking on the Crossmark logo will tell you the current status of a document and may also give you additional publication record information about the document.
|
|
September, 2021 III/2021 |