1476
Views
130
Downloads |
Taxpayers' attitudes toward tax compliance in the Slovenian tax system: differences according to gender, income level and size of settlement
Lidija Hauptman* 
Lidija Hauptman
Affiliation: Department of Accounting and Auditing, University of Maribor, Faculty of Economics and Business, Maribor, Slovenia
 0009-0005-2282-7804
Correspondence
lidija.hauptman@um.si
Berislav Žmuk*
Berislav Žmuk
Affiliation: Department of Statistics, University of Zagreb, Faculty of Economics and Business, Zagreb, Croatia
0000-0003-3487-1376
Ivana Pavić*
Ivana Pavić
Affiliation: Department of Accounting, University of Zagreb, Faculty of Economics and Business, Zagreb, Croatia
0000-0002-1597-3652
Article | Year: 2024 | Pages: 177 - 201 | Volume: 48 | Issue: 2 Received: September 29, 2023 | Accepted: February 16, 2024 | Published online: June 10, 2024
|
FULL ARTICLE
FIGURES & DATA
REFERENCES
CROSSMARK POLICY
METRICS
LICENCING
PDF
|
Code
|
Questionnaire variables
|
Theoretical dimension
|
|
TC
|
I feel a moral obligation to pay my
taxes.
|
Tax compliance
|
|
EF1
|
To my knowledge, I can deduct all
personal expenses in calculating my tax liability.
|
Knowledge of paying taxes
|
|
EF2
|
Taxpayers cannot object or make appeal
against Tax Authority assessments.
|
Knowledge of the tax system
|
|
EF3
|
If tax rates are too high tax evasion is morally
acceptable.
|
Tax evasion attitude
|
|
EF4
|
I pay taxes because the risk of being
audited is too high.
|
Probability of audit
|
|
EF5
|
Serious enforcement and penalty by the
FURS may result if I do not comply.
|
Probability of punishment
|
|
PF1
|
I would feel guilty-bad if I did not pay
my full share of taxes.
|
Feeling bad if evade
|
|
PF2
|
Working for cash-in-hand payment without
paying tax is a trivial offence.
|
Disapprove of shadow purchases
|
|
PF3
|
Paying taxes is one of the basic duties
of citizenship.
|
Important obligation
|
|
PF4
|
Not paying taxes is one of the worst
crimes a person can commit because it harms the whole community.
|
Disapprove of shadow work
|
|
PF5
|
Tax Authority in Slovenia can be trusted
to administer the tax system fairly.
|
Trust in the government /Tax Authority
|
|
PF6
|
It is fair that individuals who
deliberately evade their taxes should be penalized with the same amount of
penalty regardless of the amount of tax evaded.
|
Fairness of punishment
|
|
PF7
|
The government ensures services,
facilities, and infrastructure for which I am very thankful.
|
Satisfaction with public services
|
|
PF8
|
I personally believe that the tax system
in Slovenia is fair.
|
Fairness of the tax system
|
|
PF9
|
I would pay taxes even if there were no
tax audits.
|
General tax compliance
|
|
PF10
|
People in my environment would strongly
disapprove if I did not meet my tax obligations.
|
Normative expectations
|
|
PF11
|
My relatives do not comply, and they have
never been penalized.
|
Empirical expectations
|
|
Variable
|
Categories
|
No. of respondents
|
Share of respondents, %
|
|
Gender
|
Male
|
187
|
48
|
|
Female
|
203
|
52
|
|
Gross
income
|
Low income
|
47
|
12
|
|
Medium
income
|
196
|
50
|
|
High
income
|
67
|
17
|
|
I prefer
not to answer
|
80
|
21
|
|
Settlement
|
Urban
settlement
|
157
|
40
|
|
Rural
settlement
|
233
|
60
|
|
Code
|
Responses
(%)
|
Mean
|
St. dev.
|
Min.
|
Median
|
Max.
|
Skewness
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
|
TC
|
2
|
7
|
22
|
27
|
42
|
4.00
|
1.06
|
1
|
4
|
5
|
-0.82
|
|
EF1
|
21
|
18
|
41
|
13
|
7
|
2.65
|
1.15
|
1
|
3
|
5
|
0.12
|
|
EF2
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
16
|
6
|
2.53
|
1.21
|
1
|
2
|
5
|
0.33
|
|
EF3
|
31
|
26
|
24
|
13
|
5
|
2.34
|
1.19
|
1
|
2
|
5
|
0.50
|
|
EF4
|
8
|
8
|
24
|
23
|
37
|
3.74
|
1.26
|
1
|
4
|
5
|
-0.69
|
|
EF5
|
22
|
41
|
28
|
8
|
2
|
2.26
|
0.94
|
1
|
2
|
5
|
0.48
|
|
PF1
|
4
|
8
|
29
|
24
|
35
|
3.79
|
1.12
|
1
|
4
|
5
|
-0.57
|
|
PF2
|
20
|
21
|
31
|
20
|
7
|
2.74
|
1.20
|
1
|
3
|
5
|
0.07
|
|
PF3
|
10
|
23
|
43
|
16
|
8
|
2.90
|
1.06
|
1
|
3
|
5
|
0.11
|
|
PF4
|
10
|
20
|
28
|
28
|
14
|
3.15
|
1.19
|
1
|
3
|
5
|
-0.16
|
|
PF5
|
9
|
17
|
45
|
24
|
5
|
3.01
|
0.98
|
1
|
3
|
5
|
-0.24
|
|
PF6
|
27
|
15
|
26
|
17
|
14
|
2.76
|
1.39
|
1
|
3
|
5
|
0.14
|
|
PF7
|
9
|
40
|
37
|
10
|
4
|
2.60
|
0.92
|
1
|
3
|
5
|
0.49
|
|
PF8
|
12
|
36
|
32
|
15
|
5
|
2.64
|
1.02
|
1
|
3
|
5
|
0.36
|
|
PF9
|
9
|
12
|
28
|
25
|
26
|
3.46
|
1.24
|
1
|
4
|
5
|
-0.39
|
|
PF10
|
7
|
12
|
43
|
24
|
14
|
3.27
|
1.06
|
1
|
3
|
5
|
-0.18
|
|
PF11
|
2
|
9
|
22
|
27
|
39
|
3.92
|
1.08
|
1
|
4
|
5
|
-0.69
|
|
Variable
|
TC
|
EF1
|
EF2
|
EF3
|
EF4
|
EF5
|
PF1
|
PF2
|
PF3
|
PF4
|
PF5
|
PF6
|
PF7
|
PF8
|
PF9
|
PF10
|
|
EF1
|
-0.05
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EF2
|
-0.10
|
0.34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EF3
|
-0.29
|
0.11
|
0.18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EF4
|
0.16
|
0.09
|
0.10
|
-0.14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EF5
|
-0.17
|
0.11
|
0.10
|
0.10
|
-0.27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PF1
|
0.72
|
-0.04
|
-0.08
|
-0.29
|
0.32
|
-0.21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PF2
|
-0.18
|
0.34
|
0.25
|
0.16
|
0.15
|
0.04
|
-0.26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PF3
|
0.30
|
0.02
|
-0.05
|
-0.17
|
0.16
|
0.01
|
0.41
|
-0.12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PF4
|
0.33
|
-0.09
|
-0.10
|
-0.28
|
0.00
|
-0.12
|
0.38
|
-0.19
|
0.52
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PF5
|
0.18
|
0.14
|
0.00
|
-0.15
|
-0.06
|
-0.02
|
0.06
|
-0.01
|
0.09
|
0.10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PF6
|
-0.11
|
0.41
|
0.29
|
0.09
|
0.13
|
0.08
|
-0.09
|
0.21
|
-0.05
|
-0.01
|
0.06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PF7
|
-0.11
|
-0.07
|
0.16
|
0.08
|
0.09
|
0.10
|
-0.05
|
0.04
|
0.04
|
-0.10
|
-0.32
|
0.07
|
|
|
|
|
|
PF8
|
0.15
|
0.01
|
-0.18
|
-.013
|
0.00
|
-0.03
|
0.16
|
-0.12
|
0.06
|
0.13
|
0.30
|
0.08
|
-0.22
|
|
|
|
|
PF9
|
0.68
|
-0.04
|
-0.09
|
-0.34
|
0.04
|
0.04
|
0.59
|
-0.19
|
0.34
|
0.30
|
0.20
|
-0.09
|
-0.07
|
0.13
|
|
|
|
PF10
|
0.34
|
0.07
|
0.12
|
-0.10
|
0.13
|
-0.13
|
0.25
|
0.06
|
0.12
|
0.13
|
0.25
|
0.16
|
-0.13
|
0.04
|
0.37
|
|
|
PF11
|
0.18
|
-0.33
|
-0.27
|
-0.23
|
0.10
|
-0.31
|
0.21
|
-0.24
|
-0.03
|
-0.04
|
-0.07
|
-0.23
|
0.02
|
0.13
|
0.11
|
-0.07
|
sf Note: Polychoric correlation values higher than 0.50 are in bold.
|
Code
|
Number of
|
Number of
|
Sample size
|
Emp.
Chi-square
|
p-value
|
H0
|
|
disagreements
|
agreements
|
|
|
Male
|
Female
|
Male
|
Female
|
|
|
|
|
|
TC
|
21
|
14
|
116
|
154
|
305
|
3.63
|
0.0566
|
Not rejected
|
|
EF1
|
68
|
87
|
39
|
37
|
231
|
1.14
|
0.2863
|
Not rejected
|
|
EF2
|
91
|
107
|
48
|
38
|
284
|
2.33
|
0.1269
|
Not rejected
|
|
EF3
|
100
|
125
|
38
|
32
|
295
|
2.08
|
0.1495
|
Not rejected
|
|
EF4
|
32
|
31
|
113
|
121
|
297
|
0.12
|
0.7242
|
Not rejected
|
|
EF5
|
114
|
131
|
19
|
17
|
281
|
0.49
|
0.4833
|
Not rejected
|
|
PF1
|
29
|
17
|
100
|
132
|
278
|
6.14
|
0.0132
|
Rejected
|
|
PF2
|
67
|
93
|
60
|
48
|
268
|
4.84
|
0.0278
|
Rejected
|
|
PF3
|
61
|
67
|
41
|
55
|
224
|
0.54
|
0.4618
|
Not rejected
|
|
PF4
|
61
|
57
|
71
|
91
|
280
|
1.70
|
0.1928
|
Not rejected
|
|
PF5
|
49
|
50
|
55
|
60
|
214
|
0.06
|
0.8076
|
Not rejected
|
|
PF6
|
88
|
78
|
58
|
65
|
289
|
0.97
|
0.3247
|
Not rejected
|
|
PF7
|
92
|
98
|
28
|
26
|
244
|
0.20
|
0.6563
|
Not rejected
|
|
PF8
|
96
|
93
|
37
|
39
|
265
|
0.10
|
0.7561
|
Not rejected
|
|
PF9
|
45
|
38
|
86
|
110
|
279
|
2.50
|
0.1137
|
Not rejected
|
|
PF10
|
38
|
34
|
64
|
85
|
221
|
1.89
|
0.1697
|
Not rejected
|
|
PF11
|
25
|
20
|
119
|
141
|
305
|
1.47
|
0.2247
|
Not rejected
|
|
Code
|
No. of
disagreements
|
No. of
agreements
|
Sample
size
|
Emp.
Chi-square
|
p-value
|
H0
|
|
Low
income
|
Medium
income
|
High
income
|
Low
income
|
Medium
income
|
High
income
|
|
TC
|
5
|
15
|
8
|
32
|
131
|
50
|
241
|
0.65
|
0.7213
|
Not rejected
|
|
EF1
|
12
|
75
|
31
|
10
|
28
|
18
|
174
|
3.42
|
0.1809
|
Not rejected
|
|
EF2
|
31
|
99
|
38
|
8
|
38
|
15
|
229
|
0.91
|
0.6349
|
Not rejected
|
|
EF3
|
24
|
116
|
39
|
16
|
31
|
12
|
238
|
6.09
|
0.0477
|
Rejected
|
|
EF4
|
4
|
33
|
14
|
31
|
122
|
34
|
238
|
3.79
|
0.1505
|
Not rejected
|
|
EF5
|
26
|
130
|
36
|
6
|
12
|
8
|
218
|
4.69
|
0.0958
|
Not rejected
|
|
PF1
|
6
|
19
|
10
|
30
|
118
|
39
|
222
|
1.19
|
0.5520
|
Not rejected
|
|
PF2
|
21
|
79
|
33
|
15
|
59
|
13
|
220
|
3.11
|
0.2110
|
Not rejected
|
|
PF3
|
15
|
63
|
21
|
19
|
44
|
12
|
174
|
3.05
|
0.2180
|
Not rejected
|
|
PF4
|
19
|
55
|
20
|
20
|
77
|
30
|
221
|
0.78
|
0.6763
|
Not rejected
|
|
PF5
|
18
|
44
|
18
|
11
|
59
|
20
|
170
|
3.40
|
0.1824
|
Not rejected
|
|
PF6
|
22
|
73
|
37
|
14
|
66
|
16
|
228
|
4.89
|
0.0868
|
Not rejected
|
|
PF7
|
20
|
89
|
43
|
9
|
21
|
9
|
191
|
2.44
|
0.2952
|
Not rejected
|
|
PF8
|
21
|
91
|
31
|
9
|
35
|
20
|
207
|
2.24
|
0.3267
|
Not rejected
|
|
PF9
|
14
|
46
|
10
|
17
|
91
|
41
|
219
|
6.23
|
0.0444
|
Rejected
|
|
PF10
|
14
|
33
|
12
|
13
|
65
|
32
|
169
|
4.61
|
0.1000
|
Not rejected
|
|
PF11
|
3
|
21
|
9
|
33
|
134
|
46
|
246
|
1.21
|
0.5449
|
Not rejected
|
|
Code
|
Number of
|
Number of
|
Sample
size
|
Emp.
Chi-square
|
p-value
|
H0
|
|
disagreements
|
agreements
|
|
|
Urban
|
Rural
|
Urban
|
Rural
|
|
|
|
|
|
TC
|
21
|
14
|
101
|
169
|
305
|
6.59
|
0.0103
|
Rejected
|
|
EF1
|
60
|
95
|
33
|
43
|
231
|
0.47
|
0.4927
|
Not rejected
|
|
EF2
|
79
|
119
|
40
|
46
|
284
|
1.08
|
0.2994
|
Not rejected
|
|
EF3
|
88
|
137
|
35
|
35
|
295
|
2.60
|
0.1066
|
Not rejected
|
|
EF4
|
28
|
35
|
92
|
142
|
297
|
0.54
|
0.4616
|
Not rejected
|
|
EF5
|
89
|
156
|
15
|
21
|
281
|
0.38
|
0.5355
|
Not rejected
|
|
PF1
|
23
|
23
|
89
|
143
|
278
|
2.16
|
0.1415
|
Not rejected
|
|
PF2
|
69
|
91
|
41
|
67
|
268
|
0.71
|
0.3994
|
Not rejected
|
|
PF3
|
49
|
79
|
35
|
61
|
224
|
0.08
|
0.7803
|
Not rejected
|
|
PF4
|
46
|
72
|
68
|
94
|
280
|
0.25
|
0.6148
|
HNot rejected
|
|
PF5
|
40
|
59
|
48
|
67
|
214
|
0.04
|
0.8431
|
Not rejected
|
|
PF6
|
55
|
111
|
66
|
57
|
289
|
12.23
|
0.0004
|
Rejected
|
|
PF7
|
77
|
113
|
26
|
28
|
244
|
1.00
|
0.3170
|
Not rejected
|
|
PF8
|
68
|
121
|
36
|
40
|
265
|
2.95
|
0.0859
|
Not rejected
|
|
PF9
|
37
|
46
|
84
|
112
|
279
|
0.07
|
0.7909
|
Not rejected
|
|
PF10
|
36
|
36
|
65
|
84
|
221
|
0.80
|
0.3725
|
Not rejected
|
|
PF11
|
21
|
24
|
101
|
159
|
305
|
0.98
|
0.3228
|
Not rejected
|
Crossmark is a multi-publisher initiative from Crossref to provide a standard way for readers to locate the current version of a piece of content. By applying the Crossmark logo, the Institute of Public Finance is committing to maintaining the content it publishes and to alerting readers to changes if and when they occur. Clicking on the Crossmark logo will tell you the current status of a document and may also give you additional publication record information about the document.
|
|
June, 2024
II/2024
|
