Public Sector Economics



Willingness to redistribute: the case of Poland

Sylwia Pieńkowska-Kamieniecka*
Joanna Rutecka-Góra*
Damian Walczak*
Preliminary communication   |   Year:  2019   |   Pages:  247 - 266   |   Volume:  43   |   Issue:  3
Received:  June 26, 2019   |   Accepted:  July 18, 2019   |   Published online:  September 14, 2019
Download citation       

  1. Acemoglu, D. and Robinson, J.A., 2001. A theory of political transitions. American Economic Review, 91(4), pp. 938-963 [CrossRef]

  2. Alesina, A. and La Ferrara, E., 2005a. Ethnic diversity and economic performance. Journal of economic literature, 43(3), pp. 762-800 [CrossRef]

  3. Alesina, A. and La Ferrara, E., 2005b. Preferences for redistribution in the land of opportunities. Journal of Public Economics, 89(5-6), pp. 897-931 [CrossRef]

  4. Allison, S. T., Messick, D. M. and Goethals, G. R., 1989. On being better but not smarter than others: The Mu-hammad Ali effect. Social Cognition, 7(3), pp. 275-295 [CrossRef]

  5. Andreoni, J. and Scholz, J. K., 1998. An Economic Analysis of Charitable Giving with Interdependent Preferences. Economic Inquiry, 36(3), pp. 410-428 [CrossRef]

  6. Andreoni, J., Nikiforakis, N. and Stoop, J., 2017. Are the rich more selfish than the poor, or do they just have more money? A natural field experiment. NBER Working Paper, No. 23229 [CrossRef]

  7. Barr, N., 1993. Ekonomika polityki społecznej. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Akademii Ekonomicznej w Poznaniu.

  8. Blekesaune, M. and Quadagno, J., 2003. Public attitudes toward welfare state policies: a comparative analysis of 24 nations. European Sociological Review, 19(5), pp. 425 [CrossRef]

  9. Bolle, F. [et al.], 2012. Multiple motives of pro-social behavior: evidence from the solidarity game. Theory and Decision, 72(3), pp. 303-321 [CrossRef]

  10. Brown-Kruse, J. and Hummels, D., 1993. Gender effects in laboratory public goods contribution: Do individuals put their money where their mouth is? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 22(3), pp. 255-267.

  11. Brunner, E. J., Ross, S. L. and Washington, E. L., 2008. Economics and Ideology. Evidence of The Impact Of Economic Conditions On Support For Redistribution And Other Ballot. Working Paper 14091.

  12. Büchner, S., Coricelli, G. and Greiner, B., 2007. Self-centered and other-regarding behavior in the solidarity game. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 62(2), pp. 293-303 [CrossRef]

  13. Carroll, J., McCarthy, S. and Newman, C., 2005. An Econometric Analysis of Charitable Donations in the Republic of Ireland. The Economic and Social Review, 36, pp. 229-249.

  14. Chaudhuri, A. and Gangadharan, L., 2003. Gender Differences in Trust and Reciprocity. Working Papers, No. 136. University of Auckland, Department of Economics.

  15. Cox, J. and Deck, C., 2006. When Are Women More Generous than Men? Economic Inquiry, 44(4), pp. 587-598 [CrossRef]

  16. Cox, J., 2002. Trust, reciprocity, and other-regarding preferences: Groups vs. individuals and males vs. females. In: Zwick, R., Rapoport, A. ed. Advances in Experimental Business Research. Boston: Kluwer, pp. 331-350.

  17. Dagdeviren, H., Van Der Hoeven, R. and Weeks, J., 2002. Poverty reduction with growth and redistribution. Development and Change, 33(3), pp. 383-413 [CrossRef]

  18. Dunning, D., Meyerowitz, J. A. and Holzberg, A. D., 1989. Ambiguity and Self-Evaluation: The Role of Idiosyn-cratic Trait Definitions in Self-Serving Assessments of Ability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6), pp. 1082-1090 [CrossRef]

  19. Eckel, C. C. and Grossman, P. J., 2001. Chivalry and solidarity in ultimatum games. Economic Inquiry, 39(2), pp. 171-188 [CrossRef]

  20. Elliott, A. C. and Hynan, L. S., 2011. A SAS® macro implementation of a multiple comparison post hoc test for a Kruskal–Wallis analysis. Computer methods and programs in biomedicine, 102(1), pp. 75-80 [CrossRef]

  21. Epley, N. and Dunning, D., 2000. Feeling "Holier Than Thou": Are Self-Serving Assessments Produced by Errors in Self- or Social Prediction? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(6), pp. 861-875 [CrossRef]

  22. Feltovich, N., 2003. Nonparametric tests of differences in medians: comparison of the Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney and robust rank-order tests. Experimental Economics, 6(3), pp. 273-297.

  23. Grossman, G. M. and Helpman, E., 1996. Electoral competition and special interest politics. The Review of Economic Studies, 63(2), pp. 265-286 [CrossRef]

  24. Hinrichs, K., 1995. The impact of German health insurance reforms on redistribution and the culture of solidarity. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 20(3), pp. 653-687 [CrossRef]

  25. James, R. and Sharpe, D., 2007. The Nature and Causes of the U-shaped Charitable Giving Profile. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 36(2), pp. 218–38 [CrossRef]

  26. Jung, M. H. [et al.], 2014. Paying More When Paying for Others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107(3), pp. 414-431 [CrossRef]

  27. Kakes, J. and de Winter, J., 2008. Preferences for redistribution in the Netherlands. Working Paper, No. 179.

  28. Karagiannis, N., 2007. Solidarity within Europe/solidarity without Europe. European Societies, 9(1), pp. 3-21 [CrossRef]

  29. Landry, C. [et al.], 2005. Toward and Understanding of the Economics of Charity: Evidence from a Field Experiment. NBER Working Paper, No. 11611 [CrossRef]

  30. Li, Y., 2015. The flow of soul: a sociological study of generosity in England and Wales (2001–2011). In: Li, Y., ed. Handbook of Research Methods and Applications in Social Capital. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

  31. Ma, Q. [et al.], 2015. What makes you generous? The influence of rural and urban rearing on social discounting in China. PLoS ONE, 10(7), pp. 1–11 [CrossRef]

  32. Maarse, H. and Paulus, A., 2003. Has solidarity survived? A comparative analysis of the effect of social health insurance reform in four European countries. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 28(4), pp. 585-614 [CrossRef]

  33. McKight, P. E. and Najab, J., 2010. Kruskal‐Wallis Test. In: The corsini encyclopedia of psychology. Haboken: John Wiley & Sons [CrossRef]

  34. Meeker, B. F., 1971. Decisions and Exchange. American Sociological Review, 36(3), pp. 485-495 [CrossRef]

  35. Montano-Campos, F. and Perez-Truglio, R., 2019. Giving to charity to signal smarts: evidence from a lab experiment. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 78, p. 193 [CrossRef]

  36. Nachar, N., 2008. The Mann-Whitney U: A test for assessing whether two independent samples come from the same distribution. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 4(1), pp. 13-20 [CrossRef]

  37. Nicolaïdis, K. and Viehoff, J., 2012. The Choice for Sustainable Solidarity in Post-Crisis Europe. In: G. Bajnai [et al.], eds. Solidarity: For Sale? The Social Dimension of the New European Economic Governances. Europe in Dialogue. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung, pp. 29-34.

  38. Nozick, R., 1974. Anarchy, State, and Utopia. New York: Basic Books.

  39. Olivera, J., 2015. Preferences for redistribution in Europe. IZA Journal of European Labor Studies, 4(14), pp. 1-16 [CrossRef]

  40. Oswald, A. and Powdthavee, N., 2010. Daughters and Left-Wing Voting. Review of Economics and Statistics, 92(2), pp. 213-227 [CrossRef]

  41. Ravallion, M. and Lokshin, M., 2000. Who wants to redistribute?: The tunnel effect in 1990s Russia. Journal of Public Economics, 76(1), pp. 87-104 [CrossRef]

  42. Rawls, J., 1991. Theory of Justice. In: J. Arthur and, W.H. Shaw, eds. Justice and Economic Distribution. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.

  43. Regnerus, M. D., Smith, C. and Sikkink, D., 1998. Who Gives to the Poor? The Influence of Religious Tradition and Political Location on the Personal Generosity of Americans Toward the Poor. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 37, pp. 481-93 [CrossRef]

  44. Schervish, P. and Havens, J., 1995. Do the Poor Pay More: Is the U-Shaped Curve Correct? Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 24(1), pp. 79–90 [CrossRef]

  45. Selten, R. and Ockenfels, A., 1998. An experimental solidarity game. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 34(4), pp. 517-539 [CrossRef]

  46. Stiglitz, J. E., 2000. Economics of the public sector. New York/London: W.W. Norton & Company.

  47. Tullock, G., 1997a. Economics of income redistribution. Boston ; Dordrecht ; London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

  48. Tullock, G., 1997b. The reality of redistribution. In: J. Neill, ed. Poverty and Inequality. The Political Economy of Redistribution. Michigan: W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research, pp. 127-138 [CrossRef]

  49. Van Oorschot, W., 2000. Who should get what, and why? On deservingness criteria and the conditionality of solidarity among the public. Policy and Politics, 28(1), p. 43 [CrossRef]

  50. Vargha, A. and Delaney, H. D., 1998. The Kruskal-Wallis test and stochastic homogeneity. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 23(2), pp. 170-192 [CrossRef]

  51. Walczak, D. and Pieńkowska-Kamieniecka, S., 2018. Gender Differences in Financial Behaviours. Inzinerine Ekonomika-Engineering Economics, 29(1), pp. 123-132 [CrossRef]

  52. Warner, R. L., 1991. Does the Sex of Your children Matter? Support for Feminism among Women and Men in the United States and Canada. Journal of the Marriage and Family, 53, pp. 1051-1056 [CrossRef]

  53. Wild, C. J. and Seber, G. A. F., 2011. The Wilcoxon rank-sum test. In: G: Seber, ed. Chance encounters: a first course in data analysis and inference. New York: Wiley, pp. 1-10.

  54. Yao, K., 2015. Who Gives? The Determinants of Charitable Giving, Volunteering, and Their Relationship. Wharton Research Scholars, No. 126.

  September, 2019
In order to give you a better user experience, cookies have been stored on your computer.
Accept cookie     More information